This is my response to Honoring the J in Jiu-Jitsu.
I think I’m pretty safe in saying that our style of Jiu-Jitsu is a hybrid style, originally born from Kodokan Judo. As it is with most teachers, all of the teacher’s knowledge and experience is often times incorporated into their teachings. The result is sometimes something different than what the teacher was initially taught.
As was the case with Mitsuyo Maeda, he departed Japan as a representative of Kodokan Judo, tasked with spreading the art of Judo around the world. Through the experiences from all of his travels and challenge matches, Maeda’s style of fighting as well as teaching, had evolved. By the time he settled in Brazil, the Judo he taught to Carlos Gracie was more than the Kodokan Judo with which he had left Japan.
Roseberry-Shihan studied Judo under Takaski Matsumoto-Sensei and Karate under Seikichi Toguchi-Sensei in Okinawa, Japan. He trained at the Kodokan in Japan, as well as in China and Korea. Roseberry-Shihan presently is a 10th Dan in Okinawan Goju Ryu Karate, 7th Dan in Judo, 5th Dan in Aikijujitsu and 3rd Dan in Aikido. He served as an alternate to the 1964 U.S. Olympic Judo Team, was All-Marine Corps Champion seven times, All-Service Champion three times and was the only American to capture the All-Okinawan Judo Championship. He has been teaching martial arts for over fifty years.
About twelve years ago, Roseberry-Shihan traveled to Israel where he taught Judo for a short period. One of his students, Ido Pariente, was so taken with the art that he vowed to travel to the United States to continue his training. Ido initially intended on being here for only about six months, but stayed for years. He practiced Judo and was an excellent student.
When the No Holds Barred fighting began to spread, Ido went to Shihan for advanced training in ground fighting. This is when our Jiu-Jitsu program was born.
Ido eventually began instructing this new Jiu-Jitsu class, focusing on the ground fighting elements from Judo. With his combat experience from fighting, he was able to bring real life training to his classes. From what I’m told, the early days of our Jiu-Jitsu were pretty rough and tumble, with lots of injuries. That was the down-side. The up-side was that the program produced a handful of serious athletes, one of those being Darin Brudigan. Brudigan-Sensei was also an MMA fighter, so brought all of those experiences to the mat as well. Brudigan-Sensei was my first Jiu-Jitsu teacher.
Much of Brudigan-Sensei’s style of teaching can be seen in my approach. He was a real student of the art, and a real stickler on technique. He never sugar coated anything. If you lost a fight, he’d say, “I guess you didn’t want to win bad enough.”
So that brings us to me, and our present day Jiu-Jitsu program. Definitely our lineage is straight out of Japan, rather than Brazil. But is the Jiu-Jitsu you’re learning today, the same Jiu-Jitsu that Roseberry-Shihan taught to Ido Pariente? We’ll never know exactly what was taught or what Ido added or omitted when he taught.
There are numerous elements in my teachings that come from other sources as well. My first introduction to “small circle Jiu-Jitsu” came from my practice of Hapkido, a Korean art. More recently, it mirrors my practice of Daitoryu Aikijujitsu under the teachings of Gary Gabelhouse-Sensei. He lived and studied the art in Japan and presently is a 2nd Dan in Daitoryu. Some of the control methods I teach come from my study and practice of a law enforcement defensive tactics program. The developer of that program has an extensive background in Judo. Other techniques I’ve learned are from a Russian martial art, Systema.
So, does all of this mean our program has less of a Japanese heritage? What about the newer concepts we’ve introduced, such as from the 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu system? Shall we be banished from the Dojo if others were to discover we’ve expanded our knowledge from sources other than from our Japanese forefathers? I think not.
If you’re interested in reading a brief history of Jiu-Jitsu, and even the history of Judo, John Danaher has written about this in the books, Mastering Jujitsu and Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Theory and Technique. In this book he writes, “The origins of Brazilian jiu-jitsu stem from Japan around the beginning of the twentieth century.”
If our system has Japanese roots, but we practice in the style of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, is our art Japanese Jiu-Jitsu or Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu?
I for one am proud to say I am a practitioner of Japanese Jiu-Jitsu. I think it would be false to say otherwise. No one in our lineage has any training in “Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.” Having said that, it is important to note there are different styles of Japanese Jiu-jitsu. I once attended a ”Japanese Jujitsu” seminar at our dojo. This jujitsu was nothing like what we do.
Brent touched on an interesting point in his article when he mentioned the Samurai warrior employing Jiu-Jitsu on the battlefield. You know as well as I do what it takes to control the body of another human being. It’s not easy and takes years of practice to truly master this. Suffice it to say, a true combat style of Jiu-Jitsu, employed on a battlefield, is not a rigid, stand-up system. It would incorporate a system of ground fighting much like the system we’re learning today.
Read More...
Summary only...